From: Gerhard M. <not...@gi...> - 2016-06-01 13:58:05
|
Should we define a generic neutral loss term as proposed by Steffen Neumann, see https://sourceforge.net/p/psidev/mailman/psidev-ms-vocab/?viewmonth=201605&viewday=25 and should be the terms id: MS:1002455 ! H2O neutral loss, id: MS:1002456 ! NH3 neutral loss and id: MS:1002457 ! H3PO4 neutral loss then be made obsolete? --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/HUPO-PSI/mzIdentML/issues/34 |