Re: [Psidev-pi-dev] [HUPO-PSI/mzIdentML] Cross-linking CV (#2)

[Lutz F. <not...@gi...>]

I uploaded a initial list of cross-linker. Several points I would make:
* Having a all site specificities as a list in on field seems to me the more future proof then having one filed per site and then adding new fields if somebody wants to express something else then dimeric cross-linker
* having a field that denotes just the number of reactive sites on a cross-linker
 *  less discussion about how we call what.

* how do we treat ms-cleavable cross-linker (e.g. DSSO)
 * do we store the cross-link product or the identified modifications?
 * possibly both and link them up?
* We have separate entries for the cross-linker and cross-linker with one site e.g. hydrolized
 * do we somehow flag these up as belonging together?
* We have a field "Reference" currently mostly with thermo links
 * I would prefer something less specific to a company e.g. a publication describing/using the cross-linker
  * who looks up the paper?
* what is the minimum requirement we want for adding something to the list?

 

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/HUPO-PSI/mzIdentML/issues/2#issuecomment-215132904