Re: [Psidev-pi-dev] [HUPO-PSI/mzTab] Protein group (#20)

[Johannes G. <not...@gi...>]

@ypriverol First of all, I want to stress that even though your example is valid according to the schema, it is **not** the way the format should be used.

I personally do not think that it is a good idea to add a mechanism that essentially breaks the main concept of mzTab. Every parser would then have to evaluate these additional cvParams to be sure to know what the _reporter_ protein stands for.

I therefore prefer to adapt the schema specification and explicitly rule these cases out (ie. proteins mentioned as ambiguity members **MUST NOT** be reported as individual entries - actually, I was under the impression that this was already part of the specification)

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/HUPO-PSI/mzTab/issues/20#issuecomment-214838459