From: Lydie L. <lyd...@is...> - 2015-05-28 09:50:29
|
Hi everyone, I have to catch a train at 5:40 tonight. I will try to arrive in advance at the train station and join the call from there from 5:00 to 5.30. I got some precisions from my team regarding neXtProt's Peff generator: - the source code is publicly available but conceived to communicate with neXtProt (uses neXtProt's new API) - as is, it is not applicable on UniProt entries. Adaptation to UniProt content would require rewriting the DAO classes (links between database and services). If you need to generate Peff from (non human) Swiss-Prot entries, I'd suggest you to contact the Swiss-Prot development team. Best, Lydie On 28.05.2015 01:15, Eric Deutsch wrote: > > Hi everyone, this is a reminder that we planned a call Thursday 8am > Seattle, 4pm UK time to continue our discussion on PEFF. I hope we can > get through the rest of the agenda this time. I have another hard stop > at 55 minutes past the hour, so we’ll try to finish efficiently. > > Dial in numbers: > > + Germany: 08001012079 > > + Switzerland: 0800000860 > > + UK: 08081095644 > > + Generic international: +44 2083222500 (UK number) > > + US: 877-420-0272 > > *access code: 297427 #* > > Agenda: > > - Review conclusions from last time > > - Discuss degree of PTM complexity to support > > - Support for UniMod vs. PSI-MOD > > - Review examples of PEFF > > - Review PEFF-supporting software > > - Central location for all supporting documentation > > - Listing of action items > > Thanks, > > Eric > > *From:*Eric Deutsch [mailto:ede...@sy... > <mailto:ede...@sy...>] > *Sent:* Thursday, May 21, 2015 11:26 AM > *To:* Pierre-Alain Binz; jim...@th... > <mailto:jim...@th...>; Patrick Pedrioli; en...@uw... > <mailto:en...@uw...>; cha...@cg... > <mailto:cha...@cg...>; xia...@va... > <mailto:xia...@va...>; Lydie Lane; Matt Chambers; > Har...@bi... <mailto:Har...@bi...>; > David Creasy; Eugene Kapp; ju...@eb... <mailto:ju...@eb...>; > Ger...@gm... <mailto:Ger...@gm...>; > Jones, Andy; Yasset Perez-Riverol; Karl Clauser > *Cc:* Mass spectrometry standard development; > psi...@li... > <mailto:psi...@li...>; Eric Deutsch > *Subject:* RE: PEFF call Thursday 8am Seattle, 4pm UK time > > Hi everyone, here are my notes from the PEFF call today. Please let me > know if I captured anything incorrectly. > > Note that we agreed to continue to the second part of the posted > agenda, which we did not finish today, next Thursday at the same timeslot. > > Present: Eric, Pierre-Alain, Jim, Robert, Xiaojing, Lydie, Harald, > Gerben, Yasset, Karl, Juan Antonio > > Did I miss anyone? > > Agenda: > > - Review what remains to be done > > + We need to finish spec doc, the extant single hand-crafted example > (~dozen entries), and the OBO file > > + neXtProt has been generating PEFF files regularly (not quite > compliant the spec as previously written, but are now actively fixing > the neXtProt exporter so this discussion is timely) > > + Writer from Alain Gateau? This is the neXtProt exporter? > > + Reader from Harald > > + Settle the open issues below and then update all these elements > > + Full manuscript? > > + General tool to work with PEFF files? Add/subtract elements, adjust > annotations? Would be great but not required. > > - Discuss (CTRL+A) header delimiter > > + Not new perhaps, this already exists in FASTA! > > + Or maybe not in the FASTA specification is there is one, but seen in > the wild > > + Original NCBI nr already has these (CTRL+A) > > + This PEFF feature was mainly motivated by the fact that this feature > is already existing out there in the field, by NCBI nr at least > > + For software implementations, there are several things that could > happen when faced with this, which is not good. > > + Some on the call feel this is a problematic feature that should be > avoided > > + General consensus is that this should be an explicitly disallowed > feature. Keep it simple. Repeat the sequence. > > + Could add a header keyvalue that could point to other redundant entries? > > - Discuss degree of sequence variant complexity to support > > + Explicit examples of usage should be written into the specification. > This is not there yet. > > + Discussion at PSI workshop last month moved strongly toward > excluding advanced variations completely > > + Karl proposed having two different tags, one for simple > substitutions, and one for indels and other complex things > > + Gerben in favor of including indels in separate tags > > + Pierre-Alain okay to splitting into two tags as Karl suggested > > + Karl stands by his suggestion. And also suggests deprecating > existing term to avoid confusion > > + Explicitly require that SAAV changes be in the simple SAAV term, and > NOT in the more complex term > > + Xiaojing asks what about nonsense mutation? > > + In the simple SAAV, could allow a change to an asterisk: (223:*) > General agreement on this. > > + (223|225|KPA) goes in the more complex term > > + There were rumblings that regular expressions should not be > supported anywhere? i.e. no (223|[KR]) for simple, no (223|225|[KR]PA) > in complex. Eric is not sure if there was a consensus on this. > > Ran out of time here. Skipped to last agenda item. Will continue here > next week. > > - Discuss degree of PTM complexity to support > > - Support for UniMod vs. PSI-MOD > > - Review examples of PEFF > > - Review PEFF-supporting software > > - Central location for all supporting documentation > > - Time slot for future calls > > + Broad agreement that Thursday at this time is good. We will meet > again at this time next week and continue with the agenda. > > *From:*Eric Deutsch [mailto:ede...@sy... > <mailto:ede...@sy...>] > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 20, 2015 4:18 PM > *To:* Pierre-Alain Binz; jim...@th... > <mailto:jim...@th...>; Patrick Pedrioli; en...@uw... > <mailto:en...@uw...>; cha...@cg... > <mailto:cha...@cg...>; xia...@va... > <mailto:xia...@va...>; Lydie Lane; Matt Chambers; > Har...@bi... <mailto:Har...@bi...>; > David Creasy; Eugene Kapp; ju...@eb... <mailto:ju...@eb...>; > Ger...@gm... <mailto:Ger...@gm...>; > Jones, Andy; Yasset Perez-Riverol > *Cc:* Mass spectrometry standard development; > psi...@li... > <mailto:psi...@li...>; Eric Deutsch > *Subject:* RE: PEFF call Thursday 8am Seattle, 4pm UK time > > Hi everyone, just a reminder about the PEFF call tomorrow, see below > for details. Dial-in information: > > Dial in numbers: > > + Germany: 08001012079 > > + Switzerland: 0800000860 > > + UK: 08081095644 > > + Generic international: +44 2083222500 (UK number) > > + US: 877-420-0272 > > *access code: 297427 #* > > *From:*Eric Deutsch [mailto:ede...@sy... > <mailto:ede...@sy...>] > *Sent:* Monday, May 18, 2015 2:36 PM > *To:* Pierre-Alain Binz; jim...@th... > <mailto:jim...@th...>; Patrick Pedrioli; en...@uw... > <mailto:en...@uw...>; cha...@cg... > <mailto:cha...@cg...>; xia...@va... > <mailto:xia...@va...>; Lydie Lane; Matt Chambers; > Har...@bi... <mailto:Har...@bi...>; > David Creasy; Eugene Kapp; ju...@eb... <mailto:ju...@eb...>; > Ger...@gm... <mailto:Ger...@gm...>; > Jones, Andy; Yasset Perez-Riverol > *Cc:* Mass spectrometry standard development; > psi...@li... > <mailto:psi...@li...>; Eric Deutsch > *Subject:* PEFF call Thursday 8am Seattle, 4pm UK time > > Hi everyone, it appears that we have near consensus for Thursday at > the earlier timeslot 8am PDT, 4pm UK time, so let’s plan on that. > > Agenda: > > - Review what remains to be done > > - Discuss (CTRL+A) header delimiter > > - Discuss degree of sequence variant complexity to support > > - Discuss degree of PTM complexity to support > > - Support for UniMod vs. PSI-MOD > > - Review examples of PEFF > > - Review PEFF-supporting software > > - Central location for all supporting documentation > > - Time slot for future calls > > We may not get through this all, but let’s tackle as much as we can > and continue at the next call. I’m presenting at the top of the next > hour, so I’d like to limit this call to 55 mins. > > I will send out dial-in information and reminder as we get closer. > > Thanks, > > Eric > > *From:*Eric Deutsch [mailto:ede...@sy... > <mailto:ede...@sy...>] > *Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2015 10:05 AM > *To:* Pierre-Alain Binz; jim...@th... > <mailto:jim...@th...>; Patrick Pedrioli; en...@uw... > <mailto:en...@uw...>; cha...@cg... > <mailto:cha...@cg...>; xia...@va... > <mailto:xia...@va...>; Lydie Lane; Matt Chambers; > Har...@bi... <mailto:Har...@bi...>; > David Creasy; Eugene Kapp; Eric Deutsch; ju...@eb... > <mailto:ju...@eb...>; Ger...@gm... > <mailto:Ger...@gm...> > *Cc:* Mass spectrometry standard development; > psi...@li... > <mailto:psi...@li...> > *Subject:* PEFF progress and call next week and beyond > > Hi everyone, we would like to set up some regular calls to carry PEFF > over the finish line. We had a good discussion at the PSI meeting, so > we just need to keep some momentum to get it finished. > > I would like to set up a time next week to have conference call to > discuss some of the open issues. If you are interested in working to > help complete and resubmit PEFF, please complete the Doodle poll below > (even if you cannot attend at the suggested times next week) and I > will keep you in the loop for continuing development on this. I have > sent this to the list of coauthors on the specification and other > vocal participants at the workshop that I recall. Anyone else is > welcome to join the effort even if I forgot to add you to the list above. > > http://doodle.com/but4z7ihv75byyp7 > > Attached are the latest document and the notes I took during the PSI > workshop. > > Please respond to the doodle poll and I will email some specific > agenda point in advance of the meeting. > > We should probably paste some more information here: > > http://www.psidev.info/peff > > Please email me if you have specific agenda items or other questions > or comments. > > thanks, > > Eric > -- Lydie Lane, Ph. D CALIPHO group co-director SIB-Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics Department of Human Protein Sciences, University of Geneva CMU, Michel-Servet 1, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland + 41 (0) 22 379 58 41 |