From: Steffen N. <sne...@ip...> - 2015-03-09 11:06:55
|
Hi, On Fr, 2015-03-06 at 17:03 +0100, mayerg97 wrote: ... > Changed CV terms in version 3.74.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: > ===================================================== > ************ Changed is_a relationship from 'quality estimation method > details' > ************ --> 'statistical threshold' > [Term] > id: MS:1001494 > name: no threshold > def: "In case no threshold was used." [PSI:PI] > is_a: MS:1002482 ! statistical threshold There are some ontology guidelines, which strongly discourage the uses of negative Terms "no xxx" . In practice, they are sometimes added for pragmatic reasons, but why not leaving blank if no threshold is used ? Since this is a "Changed term", it must have been present before, but I just wanted to mention for the future. Yours, Steffen -- IPB Halle AG Massenspektrometrie & Bioinformatik Dr. Steffen Neumann http://www.IPB-Halle.DE Weinberg 3 http://msbi.bic-gh.de 06120 Halle Tel. +49 (0) 345 5582 - 1470 +49 (0) 345 5582 - 0 sneumann(at)IPB-Halle.DE Fax. +49 (0) 345 5582 - 1409 |