From: David O. <do...@eb...> - 2011-12-01 13:05:51
|
Dear community, Following the issues explained in Nov 29th previous mail, in order to validate some concepts covered by MIAPE-MS, some new terms maybe should be added to the controlled vocabulary. A phone conference started to take into the consideration these points. Some were not taken into consideration because we ran out of time. Here's a list of the remaining points and at the end of this email, a list of hypothetical controlled vocabulary terms that could improve the mapping between the controlled vocabulary and the concepts covered by the MIAPE-MS (always Version 2.24 cited in this mail, last publicly available). Pending points: Discussion point 1: Difference between a “source interface” and “inlet type” =============================================== In MIAPE-MS, having the ion source as "Electrospray Ionisation (ESI)", the "Interface manufacturer, model and catalog number (where available)" are required. Is the "inlet" the same concept than "source interface"? - If it is the same, maybe the MIAPE documentation should use the c.v. term (inlet type, MS:1000007) or we should add “source interface” as exact synonym to "inlet type" - If they are different, a new “source interface” (MS:XXXXXX2) term should be added to the controlled vocabulary In both cases, explicitly asking the "manufacturer" and "model" in the MIAPE-MS guidelines makes necessary the addition of these concepts in the controlled vocabulary, under "souce attribute"? Discussion point 2: Sprayer type, coating, manufacturer, model =============================================== In MIAPE-MS, having the ion source as "Electrospray Ionisation (ESI)", the "Sprayer type, coating, manufacturer, model" are required. To cover this concept, a term called "source sprayer" (MS:XXXXXX3) was proposed (as part_of source), and several children to it: "source sprayer type", "source sprayer manufacturer", "source sprayer model". As before, explicitly asking the "manufacturer" and "model" in the MIAPE-MS guidelines makes necessary the addition of these concepts in the controlled vocabulary, under the hypothetical "source sprayer"? Discussion point 3: Sample plate =============================================== In MIAPE-MS, having the ion source as "MALDI", the "Plate composition (or type)" is required. We can cover this concept by creating a new term called "sample plate" (MS:XXXXXX4) under source, another called "sample plate type" (MS:XXXXXX5) under "sample plate" and as children to the last, the several types of sample plate types (to this moment, two are proposed as new types of plate: "stainless steel plate" and "coated glass plate"; the "precoated plate", already present in the C.V., in addition to be a "MS:1000833 ! matrix application type" should have also a relationship "is_a" to the hypothetical "sample plate type" ). Discussion point 4: Hexapole =============================================== Listed in the MIAPE-MS as a type of analyzer, we find the "hexapole". There was a proposal to introduce and "hexapole" term under "mass analyzer type". The hexapoles (and sometimes octupoles, and in some modern instruments, lens stacks) can be usually found in the triple quadrupole analyzers, as "collision cells". In "mass analyzer type" (MS:1000443), we have a general description of the analyzer (like "cyclotron", "ion trap", "orbitrap", "quadrupole"...). The hybrid mass analyzers are not directly covered here (a Q-TOF, a triple-quadrupole...). In my opinion: introducing "hexapole" as a description for a "mass analyzer type" would only be meaningful if we find some instrument based only in a hexapole as analyzer. Does anybody know an instrument analyzer based in a "hexapole"? Do we need to add this in the Controlled vocabulary under "mass analyzer type" (MS:1000443). We have a couple more of pending details left... but I think that having the previous 4 discussion points clear would be a clear improvement to move further in the validation of the MIAPE-MS requirements using the MS controlled vocabulary. Please: follow this thread with your comments, suggestions, corrections... and thanks a lot in advance. Best, David Listing of the additions and proposed change in the controlled vocabulary: ADDITIONS ======== [Term] id: MS:XXXXXX2 name: source interface def: "The source interface." [PSI:MS] relationship: part_of MS:1000458 ! source [Term] id: MS:XXXXXXX name: source interface manufacturer def: "The source interface manufacturer." [PSI:MS] relationship: part_of MS:XXXXXX2 ! source interface [Term] id: MS:XXXXXXX name: source interface model def: "The source interface model." [PSI:MS] relationship: part_of MS:XXXXXX2 ! source interface [Term] id: MS:XXXXXX3 name: source sprayer def: "The source sprayer." [PSI:MS] relationship: part_of MS:1000458 ! source [Term] id: MS:XXXXXXX name: source sprayer type def: "The source sprayer type." [PSI:MS] relationship: part_of MS:XXXXXX3 ! source sprayer [Term] id: MS:XXXXXXX name: source sprayer manufacturer def: "The source sprayer manufacturer." [PSI:MS] relationship: part_of MS:XXXXXX3 ! source sprayer [Term] id: MS:XXXXXXX name: source sprayer model def: "The source sprayer model." [PSI:MS] relationship: part_of MS:XXXXXX3 ! source sprayer [Term] id: MS:XXXXXX4 name: sample plate def: "Plate where the sample solution is spotted in a MALDI or similar instrument." [PSI:MS] relationship: part_of MS:1000458 ! source [Term] id: MS:XXXXXX5 name: sample plate type def: "The sample plate type." [PSI:MS] relationship: part_of MS:XXXXXX4 ! sample plate [Term] id: MS:XXXXXXX name: stainless steel plate def: "Stainless steel plate." [PSI:MS] is_a: MS:XXXXXX5 ! sample plate type [Term] id: MS:XXXXXXX name: coated glass plate def: "Coated glass plate." [PSI:MS] is_a: MS:XXXXXX5 ! sample plate type One existent term changed ================ A new relation in "precolated plate", now also a "sample plate type" [Term] id: MS:1000839 name: precoated plate def: "Precoated plate." [PSI:MS] is_a: MS:1000833 ! matrix application type is_a: MS:XXXXXX5 ! sample plate type -- David Ovelleiro Bioinformatician PRIDE Group Proteomics Services Team, PANDA Group EMBL European Bioinformatics Institute Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Hinxton, Cambridge, UK CB10 1SD |