Re: [Psidev-ms-dev] mzML 0.99.0 submitted to document process

[Angel P. <an...@ma...>]

On 10/4/07, Matthew Chambers <mat...@va...> wrote:
>
> I'll comment here on the mzML schema and validation of mzML instances.
> I do not see why a proper XML schema with semantic significance could
> not be generated for mzML.  XML schema have the capability to provide
> robust restrictions on both elements and attributes, and such a schema
> could be automatically generated from the CV itself (when combined with
> a skeleton model of mzML).



This is an interesting idea, but as you mention below there are no tools for
doing this, so if you have a CS masters student available .... ;)

Some people complain that mzML is not true
> XML.  That's rather misleading.


+1 on that. mzML is valid and real XML. It just isn't using the enumerated
values of XML.

-angel