From: Chris T. <chr...@eb...> - 2006-07-11 10:05:39
|
Hi all. Just a heads up, for all involved in data standardization. The quote below comes from the 'opportunities' list generated by the FDA under their 'Critical Path Initiative' (aimed at getting novel therapies to patients quicker, but without increasing risk, by addressing bottlenecks). The opportunities document is linked from the main page for the initiative, and has lots of other interesting stuff in it: http://www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/criticalpath/ One major objective might be to get this tool -- http://www.fda.gov/nctr/science/centers/toxicoinformatics/ArrayTrack/ -- to speak FuGE..? That'd then make it much simpler to leverage some of the offspring of FuGE (MAGE2, GelML, ultimately MS and now NMR formats) in that tool and others FDA might develop in the future (for example, for proteomics and metabolomics data). Anyway, the quote: "44. Development of Data Standards. Currently, clinical investigators, clinical study personnel, data managers, and FDA reviewers must cope with a plethora of data formats and conventions. Some clinical investigators report the presence of many different computer systems for data entry at their sites (for various trials), each of which uses different data conventions. Lack of standardization is not only inefficient, it multiplies the potential for error. Important standards work is underway, but much remains before the promise of shared data standards for clinical trials is realized. CDISC is paving the way by developing its Study Data Tabulation Model for describing observations in drug trials [1]. That model could someday encompass observations needed for other types of trials. Health Level 7 and CDISC are working to create standards that can be used for the exchange, management, and integration of electronic healthcare information to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of healthcare delivery [2]. In addition to improving and expanding the Model, sponsors and the FDA must undertake the hard work of retooling hardware and software to apply the new standards. This retooling includes training researchers to collect and FDA reviewers to expect data in these formats. Standardizing data archiving conventions would also enable the creation of shared data repositories, facilitating meta-analyses, data mining, and modeling to improve clinical trial design and analysis." [1] For more on CDISC (the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium), see http://www.cdisc.org/. [2] See also http://www.hl7.org/. Sorry to those who get this several times... Cheers, Chris. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ chr...@eb... http://psidev.sf.net/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |