From: Randy J. <rkj...@in...> - 2006-01-11 12:12:49
|
Richard, All acronyms require context. I like the idea of expanding them. Are there other ontologies being developed by the PSI that have the same problem? Randy Richard Cote wrote: >Hi Randy > >A quick comment on the ontology. I believe that the use of acronyms as term >names should be avoided if possible. The OBO format allows for the use of >synonyms and I believe that the acronyms should be placed there, with the >full name as the primary term name. In other ontolgies that I have seen, >this is common practice. The mzData/analysisXML files will not have the >definitions and some of these acronyms, taken out of context, quickly become >meaningless. > >id: PSI:1000070 >name: APCI > >id: PSI:1000071 >name: CI > >id: PSI:1000072 >name: EI > >id: PSI:1000073 >name: ESI > >id: PSI:1000074 >name: FAB > >id: PSI:1000075 >name: MALDI > >id: PSI:1000079 >name: FT-ICR > >id: PSI:1000084 >name: TOF > >id: PSI:1000086 >name: FWHM > >id: PSI:1000111 >name: EMT > >id: PSI:1000117 >name: ADC > >id: PSI:1000119 >name: TDC > >id: PSI:1000133 >name: CID > >id: PSI:1000134 >name: PD > >id: PSI:1000135 >name: PSD > >id: PSI:1000136 >name: SID > >Best regards, >Richard >-- >Richard Cote >Software Engineer - PRIDE Project Team (Sequence Database Group) > >European Bioinformatics Institute >Wellcome Trust Genome Campus RC...@eb... >Hinxton >Cambridge CB10 1SD Phone: (+44) 1223 492610 >United Kingdom Fax : (+44) 1223 494468 > > > > |