From: Chris T. <chr...@eb...> - 2005-12-02 10:50:29
|
Hi Jen. Just a quick response before all the Americans wake up :) Basically analysisXML has this structure that allows a number of (sub)schema 'modules' to be plugged into a 'core' bit. This means that in one incarnation it is a model of peptide/protein identification, with a description of data source, engine and parameters in one bit, the reults in the next one and finally the 'knowledge' in the third. For quantitation, there will be a similar set of modules (to cut to the chase, they aren't there yet except as stubs afaik). Basically these too may split three ways (although it isn't immediately clear to me what will be in the third bit, possibly nothing). Number one would be a 'how did I measure intensities and with what data' bit; number two being the 'here's the actual measured amounts after scaling, normalising, taking ratios etc. As I say though, it isn't there yet afaik. And I stand to be corrected once this post has been seen by those more fully in the know than I. Cheers, Chris. Jennifer Siepen wrote: > Hi, > > I am new to the list and have a query about analysisXML/mzIdent. Here at > Manchester we have a number of groups carrying out studies with > quantitation in proteomics. My query is how does analysisXML/mzIdent > cope with quantitation, and are relative and absolute quantitation both > catered for? > > Many thanks for any help/information, > > Jennifer > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ chr...@eb... http://psidev.sf.net/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |