[Psidev-ms-dev] Re: [Psidev-gps-dev] Ontology development list

[Chris S. <sto...@pc...>]

Hi Chris,
Congratulations on moving this forward! On behalf of the MGED Ontology 
working group, I'd like to offer the use of our resources if they can 
be of help. I recognize that you might want proteomics-focused 
resources to start with but you are welcome to use our tracker 
(http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=603031&group_id=16076) and mail 
list (http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mged-ontologies) to 
perhaps bring in more input and help.
Also, I would encourage you to take the plunge and start building your 
ontology with Protege rather than a simple text format as it will help 
you lots in organizing your terms, avoiding syntatic no-nos, and of 
course generating OWL files.

Cheers,
Chris

On Feb 3, 2005, at 7:47 AM, Chris Taylor wrote:

> Hello all.
>
> On Monday 7th, I will make available v0.01 of the PSI ontology in the 
> CVS (I'll announce it when done, with a location).
>
> In the first instance, and for obvious reasons, this ontology will (1) 
> be limited in richness, and (2) initially reflect the scope of the 
> mzData format. The ontology will widen out to cover the scope of the 
> draft mzIdent, the as yet undrafted GelML, and ultimately of course 
> the whole of the PSI-OM; it will also become much richer as we go. 
> [One could equally consider the scope of the various MIAPE modules...]
>
> The v0.01 file will be in a simple text format (so 'ontology' is 
> perhaps inappropriate for now, but that will change as we move into 
> OWL-based development); the aim is to get the fundamental conventions 
> settled (e.g. 'this_style' versus 'ThisStlye' and so on) and to simply 
> get the ball rolling so that mzData implementers have something to use 
> in their own software...
>
> I have set up a discussion list at 
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-onto-dev to which 
> all interested parties should subscribe. I am not yet sure which 
> mechanisms will work best for adding to and revising the ontology; I'd 
> imagine that a tracker would be the best solution long-term. For now 
> can we just stick to commenting on the list, with me implementing 
> agreed changes?
>
> Cheers, Chris.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  Chris Taylor (ch...@eb...)
>  HUPO PSI: GPS -- psidev.sf.net
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
> _______________________________________________
> Psidev-gps-dev mailing list
> Psi...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-gps-dev