From: Neumann, S. <Ste...@ip...> - 2011-03-15 19:59:13
|
Hi, Yes, GCxGC is (almost ?) always online. Here is an image: http://www.purdue.edu/discoverypark/bioscience/facilities/mpf/capabilities.php if I get it orrectly, the Y axis is the "fast" column (think seconds), the X axis the "slow" column (order of minutes). Each Pixel would be a TIC, with a full spectrum "behind" it. (Or did I mix the axes up ?) There is also some course material, including GCxGC/TOF-MS at p27 http://depts.washington.edu/chemcrs/bulkdisk/chem429A_spr07/notes_Comprehensive2D.pdf So as Nils confirmed, mzML is technically capable of carrying GCxGC data as a (large) number of spectra. However, I'd like to have (at least a rudimentary) encoding for the GCxGC settings, so that images such as the one above can be created. This would also be required for 2D peak picking (or alignment). No need to encode all sorts of GC column information, that might go into sepML or whatever. Following Nils, I'd suggest something like [Term] id: MS:1000XXX name: second column modulation time def: "The time of ..." [PSI:MS] xref: value-type:xsd\:float "The allowed value-type for this CV term." is_a: MS:1000857 ! run attribute relationship: has_units UO:0000010 ! second relationship: has_units UO:0000031 ! minute as a <cvParam> for the <run>. Any software ignoring this 2D nature would simply see a (very) strange pattern of spectra. Thoughts ? Does anyone have contact with sbd. at Leco ? Which are the other major players with GCxGC ? Yours, Steffen |