From: Steffen N. <sne...@ip...> - 2011-03-15 07:26:43
|
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 11:55 -0700, Eric Deutsch wrote: > QTRAP 5500. The group discussed this on a call some time ago, and it > seemed like the simplest way to implement this would be via multiple > <Product> elements. Why not multiple <Precursor> ? Or, even more adventurous, nested <Precursor> ? > A) Rely on tag order to denote the various levels of fragmentation: Probably the weakest option, since you can't rely on the ordering in XML through various transformations, such as database persisting etc. > B) Explicity provide an ordering via order attribute: Semantically vague, the additional information should more closely resemble the MS experiment. > C) Explicitly state an MS level, which accomplishes the same thing, > but also provides more information: Makes sense. Now that we're including MSn, we should make sure it is treated as a first-class citizen, and that the current MS2 handling is just a subset of MSn: * Can we encode different collision energies in MS2/MS3 ? Currently, CE is encoded in <Configuration> of which there can be only one per <Target>. - Include MSn settings in the <Configuration> ? - Should we allow multiple <Configuration>, and require referencing from the <Precursor> ? - Allow additional <cvParam> which carry a subset of what is otherwise kept in <Configuration> ? Better not. * Other points ? Yours, Steffen -- IPB Halle AG Massenspektrometrie & Bioinformatik Dr. Steffen Neumann http://www.IPB-Halle.DE Weinberg 3 http://msbi.bic-gh.de 06120 Halle Tel. +49 (0) 345 5582 - 1470 +49 (0) 345 5582 - 0 sneumann(at)IPB-Halle.DE Fax. +49 (0) 345 5582 - 1409 |