From: Eric D. <ede...@sy...> - 2010-10-19 17:42:27
|
Present: Matt, Steffen, Florian, Jim, Eric The current response to the review comments was gone through and discussed. Action items: - Do we want to show a little figure showing an out-of-sync transition? - <VerficationStatus> [This is not settled. Eric will grok the situation and email out a question to the list for further discussion]. - The question is do we rely order alone, or do we add a “n” attribute or “order” attribute. OR better yet use MS Level CV term? Come up with an example and email the list. - Add isolation width to mapping file - Talk to Brendan again about Skyline and TraML - add the protein terms - add link to spML file and msrun data URL probably as new CV terms - Matt suggests for last point to just use transitions relative intensity - Steffen asks about adducts? Next meeting: Next in 3 weeks. Nov 9 |