From: Robert W. <rob...@bi...> - 2010-03-08 16:33:18
|
Dear guys, I am working on protein derivatization chemistry and their subsequent LC-MS/MS characterization, and would like to integrate those methods in existing proteomics workflows, i.e. PRIDE (Protein MODs) XML, PRIDE converter and OMSSA. Clearly, for the informatics processing we need the molecular weight; which is no problem for the mono-isotopic weight, but less trivial for the average mass. These are the values as calculated by the Molecular Weight Calculator: C14H13N3O2S (Dabsyl Modification) Monoisotopic: 287.0728438 Average: 287.33804 C22H16N2O7S2 (Uniblue A Modification) Monoisotopic: 484.0398906 Average: 484.50372 However, different other programs give slightly different results for the average mass, e.g. for Uniblue A: Chemsketch (ACDlabs): av. 484.5016 Online Calculator (Webqc.org): av. 484.5048 1) So, which average weights should we take? For practical applications it might not matter, but anyway the information should be consistent. 2) Would it be possible to define the chemical modifications as chemical formula, e.g. delta C14H13N3O2S ? So, changed IUPAC values could be incorporated easier. 3) Would it be possible for PRIDE to define the chemical modification only, and to give the amino acid as an option? I'm looking forward for your answers and have a nice weekend, Robert |