From: Matthew C. <mat...@va...> - 2009-12-14 18:18:55
|
What makes you say that? Can the validator even validate that attributes have certain string values? And as we agreed in Turku, mapping file changes constitute a version bump for mzML. We just never decided how to handle the index wrapper schema. -Matt Angel Pizarro wrote: > sounds like an issue for the validator. -a > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Matthew Chambers > <mat...@va... > <mailto:mat...@va...>> wrote: > > Hello mzML fans, > > Apparently, Mass++ is writing indexed mzML files (yay!), but it > uses an > unexpected "chroms" name to identify the chromatogram index > (boo!). The > mzML_idx XSD does not specify what are the possible values for that > attribute. Obviously, it's impossible to write a reader that uses > indexes if the indexes have been written with arbitrary names. It's of > course possible to ignore the index in these cases, but we should nip > this issue in the bud. We can release 1.1.1 to add the restriction. > MzML.xsd wouldn't even change, just mzML_idx.xsd. Which leads to the > question of whether we should bump mzML's version or not if only > the idx > wrapper changes... > > -Matt > > |