From: Matt C. <mat...@va...> - 2009-09-22 14:23:04
|
Hi Andreas, I argued several weeks ago that TraML should perhaps be TarML to include non-SRM use cases, but it was a hypothetical suggestion. It will need someone in the group who understands those use cases to advocate for it. -Matt Andreas Bertsch wrote: > Dear TraML enthusiasts, > > > during a developer meeting of the OpenMS developers the need for > specifying inclusion and exclusion lists came up. This is a frequently > asked feature to produce such lists for different experiments and from > various data sources. The files used to encode and transfer such > information to the mass spectrometer's acquisition software are mostly > csv and tsv file formats, similar to those of transition > specification. Of course different ones for different vendors or even > different instruments. > > The information encoded in TraML is very similar to that needed for > inclusion and exclusion lists. Especially precursors, peptides and > proteins and information about how they were selected, and so on. > It seems to me that the changes necessary for TraML to also support > inclusion and exclusion lists are very small. (Except that the format > name is a bit misleading, maybe TarML, for targeted experiments ;) ) > > I'll try to attend the phone conference today. > > Cheers, > A. |