From: Matt C. <mat...@va...> - 2009-01-02 15:56:26
|
It looks good. I think we should stick with "merged=<index>" for the id format, just because it's simpler to ignore the method of combination at that level. Presumably the other scan elements will have their own scan times in the final file? Can't think of anything else, good job! The file makes perfect sense to me, this approach is leaps and bounds better than previous attempts at showing merged scans. -Matt Fredrik Levander wrote: > Hi All, > > I uploaded a preliminary 1.1.0 mzML file which contains summed scans, > generated by conversion of a ProteinLynx Global Server file. > > http://dev.thep.lu.se/fp6-prodac/browser/trunk/mzML/scans/plgs_example_1.1.0.mzML > > The file still has to go through semantic validation, but I was mainly > wondering if anyone has opinions about how the spectrum/scan ids are > written, (and if the file makes sense at all)? > > Regards > > Fredrik > > |