From: Eric D. <ede...@sy...> - 2008-12-30 19:07:39
|
Hi Fredrik, would you update your xsd to reflect this when you have a chance? > -----Original Message----- > From: Fredrik Levander [mailto:Fre...@im...] > Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 7:34 AM > To: Mass spectrometry standard development > Subject: Re: [Psidev-ms-dev] precursor/product/neutral loss/SRM/MSE/MS3 > scans > > Hi Matt, you're right about the keyrefs, I didn't think about that > possibility. All of them should definitely be there then. > > Fredrik > > Matt Chambers skrev: > > Hi Fredrik, > > > > As far as the keyrefs go, I put them because ID and IDREF merely > > validate that any id is pointed to, not an id of the appropriate element > > type. For example, with just ID/IDREF, a spectrumRef could refer to a > > sourceFile's id attribute. That's obviously undesirable and with > > key/keyref it's easily avoidable and validates with just the schema. > > Thanks to Angel for showing me how to use them. > > > > -Matt > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > _______________________________________________ > Psidev-ms-dev mailing list > Psi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-dev |