From: <cod...@go...> - 2008-11-26 13:51:37
|
Comment #36 on issue 42 by a.bertsch0815: Issues with the CV http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=42 Units in terms: We agreed to use the following a structure for units in the CV (stolen from mzML): [Term] id: MS:1000004 name: sample mass def: "Total mass of sample used." [PSI:MS] xref: value-type:xsd\:float "The allowed value-type for this CV term." is_a: MS:1000548 ! sample attribute relationship: has_units UO:0000002 ! mass unit An example in mzML would look like this. <cvParam cvRef="MS" accession="MS:1000016" name="scan time" value="5.8905" unitCvRef="UO" unitAccession="UO:0000031" unitName="minute"/> Which would be straightforward for semantic validation. Any term which has a "has_units" relationship, must have a unit. However, at the moment, cvParam cannot have an unitAccession or unitName or unitCvRef attribute (PropertyValue not included in cvParamType) in the schema. Do I miss something or do we need a schema change if we want to do it similar to mzML, which would be my favorite. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings |