From: Pierre-Alain B. <pie...@is...> - 2008-11-12 16:25:45
|
Hi, David Creasy wrote: > Hi Pierre-Alain, > > Pierre-Alain Binz wrote: >> Thanks David. >> FYI, for mzML, we had generated a excel mapping spreadsheet (if you >> want to see it...) > Yes please. (I can't see it on psidev.info). you can find a temp version at ftp://ftp.genebio.com/div/MIAPE-mzML-mapping.01.xls > >> >> The format is ok for me. About the notes: the descriptions of what >> should be the content from a MIAPE point of view are in the MIAPE >> document, in the Annex table. > Oh yes... > >> >> Note also that for mzML-MIAPE MS mapping, there were a few items not >> covered by MIAPE, and also not covered by mzML. The latest have >> either been annotated for a future version of mzML (similar to the >> quantitation in AnalysisXML), or just left out and annotated as such >> (for instance flow rates, detector sensitivity). Either they are >> independant or an estimation that looks more like an interpretation. >> We there need to decide whether those should be taken out of MIAPE or >> not. > We will aim to add anything missing (apart from quantitation) before > submission to the document process. > >> >> I have commented two of the notes. If there are unclear items, just >> put a note in and I can clarify > Yes please! I can't remember what we intended from "Location of the > files generated". The definition is: > "The location of the data generated. If made available in a public > repository, describe the URI (for instance an url, or the url of the > repository and the information on how to retrieve the data). If not > made available for public access, describe the contact person > reference or source and the internal coordinates of the data." > > But _what_ data does this refer to? The peak list, the analysisXML > document, intermediate files like Sequest .out files or any/all of > these? If it's the analysisXML file, you presumably have it and you > must know where you got it from ;) the files used to generate the AnalysisXML file... > >> >> One more: for mzML, we have two (at least) levels of stringency for >> the validators: basic semantic and MIAPE compliance. Therefore we can >> deal with legacy being compliant woth the format, even if it does not >> comply with MIAPE > Sounds good, > > David voila, Pierre-Alain >> >> >> Cheers >> Pierre-Alain >> >> David Creasy wrote: >>> I've started on the MIAPE conformance doc: >>> >>> http://psidev.info/index.php?q=node/386 >>> >>> Can we discuss whether this is a suitable format on the call later. >>> (Looks as though we may have a couple of things to add to the >>> schema...) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> David >>> >>> David Creasy wrote: >>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> There will be an AnalysisXML working group conference call on >>>> WEDNESDAY >>>> (instead of Thursday) at: >>>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=12&month=11&year=2008&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=136 >>>> >>>> >>>> Minutes from last meeting at: >>>> http://psidev.info/index.php?q=node/384 >>>> >>>> >>>> Agenda: (strangely identical to last week, although progress has >>>> been made!) >>>> 1. Review of minutes of last meeting >>>> >>>> 2. Status of mapping document and CV >>>> >>>> 3. Issue 30: Enzymes >>>> http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=30 >>>> Almost complete now? >>>> http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=30&can=1#c37 >>>> >>>> 4. Other items on the issues list: >>>> http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/list >>>> >>>> Dial in details: >>>> >>>> + Germany: 08001012079 >>>> + Switzerland: 0800000860 >>>> + UK: 08081095644 >>>> + USA: 1-866-314-3683 >>>> + Generic international: +44 2083222500 (UK number) >>>> >>>> access code: 297427 >>>> >>>> >>> >>> > |