Re: [Psidev-pi-dev] PSI-PI Working group conference call on Thursday 23rd October at 4:00pm UK time

[Matthew C. <mat...@va...>]

I can quickly come up with a straightforward suggestion for representing 
tags as intermediate results. They aren't identifications, so I'm not 
sure if they should go in SpectrumIdentificationResult or an element 
type of their own. But certainly they need a type separate from 
SpectrumIdentificationItem, i.e. SpectrumSequenceTagItem. So a single 
SpectrumIdentificationResult for a sequence tagging analysis might look 
like:
> <SpectrumIdentificationResult id="result_ref_178_1">
>   <SpectrumSequenceTagItem id="tag_ref_178_1"
>                            NTerminusFlankingMass="123.4"
>                            CTerminusFlankingMass="567.8">
>     <SequenceTagEvidence>LKS</SequenceTagEvidence>
>     <pf:cvParam accession="PI:x" name="directag_total_expect" cvRef="PSI-PI" value="0.00123"/>
>     <pf:cvParam accession="PI:x" name="directag_intensity_pvalue" cvRef="PSI-PI" value="0.00002"/>
>     <pf:cvParam accession="PI:x" name="directag_mz_fidelity_pvalue" cvRef="PSI-PI" value="0.0003"/>
>     <pf:cvParam accession="PI:x" name="directag_rank" cvRef="PSI-PI" value="1"/>
>   </SpectrumSequenceTagItem>
>   <SpectrumElement spectrumID="" SpectraData_ref="SD_1"/>
> </SpectrumIdentificationResult>
>   
-Matt


David Creasy wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> There will be an AnalysisXML working group conference call today at:
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=23&month=10&year=2008&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=136
>
> Minutes from last meeting at:
> http://psidev.info/index.php?q=node/378
>
> Agenda:
>
> 2. Progress with Sequence Tag example (Matt )