From: David C. <dc...@ma...> - 2008-08-07 14:04:11
|
Hi Martin, Angel, The use of 15N (or other metabolic labelling) isn't really a modification. We'd have to duplicate every nitrogen containing modification in PSI-MOD - once with standard 14N and once with 15N. And then maybe the same for 13C... David Martin Eisenacher wrote: >>> This seems to work pretty well (as expected!!) >>> The interesting thing is that there are two sets of residue masses, two >>> SpectrumIdentificationList (one for light, one for heavy) but just one >>> ProteinDetectionList. > At first glance I thought it would be better to have one residue mass list > and a modification for N15 (see below). But I saw it was a bad solution. > > It indeed works like you modeled it, because we don't report any masses > for DBSequences or Proteins. > > >>> And (possibly confusing at first glance!) unmodified peptides with >>> different masses like this: >>> >>> <Peptide id="peptide_48_1" sequenceMass="1025.481796" > >>> <peptideSequence>STNLDWYK</peptideSequence> >>> </Peptide> >>> >>> <Peptide id="peptide_53_1" sequenceMass="1036.449188"> >>> <peptideSequence>STNLDWYK</peptideSequence> >>> </Peptide> >> I think this is where I come in with the mod specifications for >> peptide results. I'll try and add this as an example to issue 35 > It could be possible in the current schema with the CustomModification element. > But that should be "extended" to report "elements" (N, C, O) instead > of "locations". > Or PSI-MOD has to include "N15 mod of amino acid X" with the respective mass > or delta mass, which maybe there already. But that would be quite verbose. > > Bye > Martin > -- David Creasy Matrix Science 64 Baker Street London W1U 7GB, UK Tel: +44 (0)20 7486 1050 Fax: +44 (0)20 7224 1344 dc...@ma... http://www.matrixscience.com Matrix Science Ltd. is registered in England and Wales Company number 3533898 |