Re: [Psidev-pi-dev] Translation table

[Martin E. <mar...@ru...>]

Hi!

> > <!-- Then a new element (subclass of
PeptideEvidence) under
ProteinDetectionHypothesis
> >         <ProteinAmbiguityGroup
identifier="hit_1" >
> > <ProteinDetectionHypothesis
identifier="prot_1" Sequence_ref =
"EST_1">
> >
<TranslatedPeptideEvidence start="160"
end="171" 
> > SpectrumIdentificationItem_ref="1_1"
post="K" pre="I" frame = "3"
> > TranslationTable_ref="Table_1"
> >
> > Does this make sense?
> Yes. But it makes it harder for a
parser to have to look for
TranslatedPeptideEvidence and
> PeptideEvidence?
> Why not just add optional attributes
to PeptideEvidence?
With optional attributes it would be
possible to code peptide results
containing 
reference to a nucleotide sequence
without frame and translation table
attribute (frame can be eventually
reconstructed).
With mandatory attributes (can be
schema-coded if we have
TranslatedPeptideEvidence!)
this can be avoided.
So I vote for Andy's proposal.

  Bye
    Martin