From: Mike C. <tu...@gm...> - 2008-06-10 17:43:47
|
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Eric Deutsch <ede...@sy...> wrote: > + Jim talked to Steve Musser at FDA. They are considering accepting mzML as > a format to avoid cherry-picked spectra, but it would need some kind of > non-text audit trail information. Does this actually mean that they want "non-text" audit trail information as opposed to textual audit trail information? I wonder what an audit trail would entail here. The obvious thing to do would be to simply cryptographically sign the mzML file using something like PGP. > + Should we set up an mzML.org? If you're seriously considering this, I suggest that someone grab it immediately. (I've had good luck with gandi.net as a registrar.) Mike |