|
From: Joshua T. <jt...@sy...> - 2008-02-25 20:56:48
|
Hi Fredrik, Catching up: massWolf simply renumbers all scans starting with "1" in the mzXML output. Like I said in a different post, we'll be adding a "native scan reference" to mzXML for each vendor software type. Josh Fredrik Levander wrote: > Hi All, > > In QTOF files from Waters with mixed MS1 and MS2 data we have several > parallel 'functions' with data being recorded into separate files. The > scan numbers are only unique within each function. In the raw data > folder we thus have several different spectra with the same scan number > (but different source files). When converting this into an mzML file it > would be good to keep the original scan numbers which are useful for > traceability, but to generate unique spectrum ids. I thus propose that > the requirement for unique scanNumbers within an mzML file is removed. > However, spectra should not be repeated within the file, so this would > NOT be applicable to the dta to mzML conversion use case. > Would such a change generate problems for the readers? > How is this solved in MassWolf? > > > Regards > > Fredrik > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Psidev-ms-dev mailing list > Psi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-dev |