From: Darren K. <dke...@ya...> - 2008-02-19 15:59:33
|
> I'm not inclined to change it because I'm lazy and because I suspect it > will make Darren and Brian sad. I won't be sad ;) I hadn't noticed before now that the <scan> element is optional. I don't like the idea of bogus scanNumber and msLevel if there is no <scan>. For current applications (e.g. RAMP and converted mzXML files) this won't make a significant difference in parsing the mzML. I would vote for consistency over the very slight easing of parsing. Darren |