Re: [Ps2hacking-devel] Building mipsEE-linux chain

[Joseph P. <pa...@mc...>]

Right, could you send the patches then?  I can't find them on the website.
Or do i need to generate my own?  I don't see them in either the dists or
on the website.

	--Joe



On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, M. R. Brown wrote:

> * Joseph Paris <pa...@mc...> on Tue, Sep 11, 2001:
> 
> > Are the patch files built and ready to go?  Or do they still have to be
> > generated off what we have now?
> > 
> 
> Um, did you read my last post?  I've included it here just in case.
> 
> M. R.
> 
> > 	--Joe
> > 
> > On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, M. R. Brown wrote:
> > 
> > > * Joseph Paris <pa...@mc...> on Tue, Sep 11, 2001:
> > > 
> > > > I put together a ps2-dvp-binutils package that one should be able to do a
> > > > ./configure --target=dvp and have it produce the correct binutils...  The
> > > > build process may be a bit twichty, but i think i've resolved most of
> > > > those problems....  This is built off the snsys ee-binutils source.  If
> > > > there is a need for it, i can send it.
> > > > 
> > > > Can someone help explain why there needs to be so many different sets of
> > > > binutils for ps2 dev?  Is there a reasonable way to start combining these?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > There doesn't need to be.  You can combine the iop and ee/dvp patches into
> > > one binutils and gcc source that you can use to build all toolsets.
> > > AFAICT, you could even use the *same* compiler for the IOP and EE by using
> > > custom gcc specs and options.
> > > 
> > > In a few days I'll be asking the binutils and gcc folks why these patches
> > > never made it in and if there is any objection to them being included into
> > > mainline binutils and gcc.  But the patches do need to be cleaned up and
> > > rewritten (to an extent) for the current binutils and gcc stock (the
> > > patches are over 2 years old).
> > > 
> > > If anyone else (Sony or Cygnus/Redhat) has any other insight into these
> > > tools I'd appreciate hearing them.
> > > 
> > > M. R.
> > > 
> > > 
> 
>