Menu
▾
▴
[proxyTools-users] [noCensorship] Re: Fed up with LP
|
From: Madani A. <mad...@ho...> - 2003-05-06 19:19:00
|
>From: wayne <wa...@ny...> >Reply-To: noc...@fr... >> > 1. Cyberia: HiWayne I tested LP (with the new changes) this evening using SBM account and the original [config-KSA-sbm.xml] file guess what >> This is localProxy Engine (the 'back end'), version: 4.254 Building configuration KSA-sbm Please wait, this may take a few minutes (you may avoid this in future by using the 'last' config)... I'm assuming this IP address is 212.46.37.* Waiting for the front end to connect ... connected Importing globals.xml version 4.12 Importing hosts.xml version 4.1664 Importing commStrats.xml version 4.7 Importing services.xml version 4.23 Importing firewalls.xml version 4.111 Importing config-KSA-sbm.xml version 4.1 No (or incomplete) credentials found in environment Using firewall: KSA-sbm DNS addresses from o/s: 212.46.32.35, 212.46.32.45 Name servers (o/s and firewall info): 212.46.32.35, 212.46.32.45, 212.46.32.65, 212.46.32.33 Accessible subnets: 212.46.32.0/19, KSA-awalnet, KSA-shabakah, KSA-TRInet, KSA-cyberia, KSA-spsnet, KSA-sol, KSA-iccnet, KSA-sahara, 212.46.32.0/19 DnsTimeout initialized: 5.5 Sorting hosts (uses DNS, please connect)... Filled layer 10119.1.*.- (3/10), (max,min) score was (0.4, 0.0016) Filled layer 10080.0.*.- (0/10), (max,min) score was (-1, -1) Disabling 10080 (non-censoring HTTP proxy - standard).0 - no layer 0 hosts available Filled layer 10080.1.*.- (10/10), (max,min) score was (0.4, 0.00032) Filled layer 10080.1.-.* (10/10), (max,min) score was (1, 0.072) Filled layer 10080.2.*.- (10/10), (max,min) score was (0.4, 0.058) Filled layer 10082.0.*.- (1/10), (max,min) score was (0.052, 0.052) Filled layer 10082.1.*.- (10/10), (max,min) score was (0.4, 0.00032) Filled layer 10082.1.-.* (10/10), (max,min) score was (0.18, 0.061) Filled layer 10082.2.*.- (10/10), (max,min) score was (0.4, 0.0025) Filled layer 10076.0.*.- (10/10), (max,min) score was (0.4, 0.058) Filled layer 10076.1.*.- (10/10), (max,min) score was (0.4, 0.00032) Filled layer 10076.1.-.* (10/10), (max,min) score was (0.6, 0.17) Filled layer 10076.2.*.- (10/10), (max,min) score was (0.4, 0.058) Checking all layer 0 hosts for connectivity... Results from isConnectable: 100010000110111000 Unable to connect to 212.116.196.165:80 204.113.91.64:8001 212.116.196.52:80 24.129.32.175:9631 216.126.204.21 :8303 212.33.169.3:80 216.206.18.12:8002 205.205.143.254:8002 218.145.25.108:8081 206.129.0.18:8281 212.116.19 7.162:80 Couldn't connect to 11 proxies Don't panic, I can probably work ok without them LocalProxy is offering services on the following ports: 10076:non-censoring HTTPS proxy 10078:HTTP zapped advertisement proxy 10079:proxy autoconfiguration 10080:non-censoring HTTP proxy - standard 10081:localProxy control 10082:anonymous, non-censoring HTTP proxy 10119:Usenet news - ccnews For web browser proxy service, please configure your web browser http proxy entry to localhost:10080 and the https proxy entry to localhost:10076 now Only accepting connections from 127.0.0.1, 212.46.37.* Executed getConfig(), result (truncated): <perldata> <hash> ... Making test request: GET http://www.mhho.com/Links/Random.html Original request: GET http://www.mhho.com/Links/Random.html HTTP/1.0 Executed $debug, result: 3 Response info: 00000 Status code: 200 10080.2.4.-: 3.89:3.83 (0(80.1) 0.022(80.2)) (0 - 0 0 3.8 - - - 0 -) 3.9(=4.52/1.16) [---] >< Loaded 10080,1:connect, layer 0 proxies: 204.113.91.64:8001 - 212.46.32.42:80 212.116.196.52:80 212.46.32.54:80 212.46.32.34:80 - 212.116.211.242:80 - 212.46.32.65:80 218.145.25.108:8081- 212.116.197.162:80 24.129.32.175:9631- (I added minus sign (-) for dead /refused proxies) >< Loaded 10080, 2:direct modified, layer 0 proxies: 66.119.34.38:80 192.166.53.5:80 - 212.141.54.32:80 - 148.233.111.232:80 150.55.56.51:80 - 192.168.24.24:80 - 203.111.194.20:80 61.203.138.26:80 - 210.80.207.147:80 - 65.204.190.26:8000 AND THE RESULTS ARE ... Wow, it was a long time (do not recall), where I could use LP version 4.xx with SBM. Believe it It is working>>> Thanks Wayne. Now to the observations: 1. Open proxies in KSA network Just for info, I scan the Network (monthly) using ProxyHunter for open (get/connectable) proxies. I use Statproxy to verify the findings and use good ones. No one ISP intentionally leaves their proxies open. i.e. there is no actual [otherAccessibleSubnets] new only sporadic proxies that are left open for some time. I am thinking that if we allow another subnet from another ISP to be considered as accessible just because of one good proxy, all other proxies that are not reachable may be selected by LP and thus jut make it slaw and prevent it from selecting other proxies that may be good (hope I am mistaken). 2. Last knight, I ran HttPort (using proxy.sbm.net.sa:80) just to compare it with LP. I was surprised to see that it did not support connect: [proxy.sbm.net.sa:80 New mapping: CONNECT failed with retcode 405 (method not allowed) - your proxy does not support HTTP CONNECT method] It was more than a month since the last time I used HttPort. I remembered that proxy.sbm.net.sa:80 is actually 212.46.32.34:80. HttPort still works with other proxies such as 212.46.32.54:80 I thought that this may be the reason why LP did not choose any SBM proxies. But now I know that is not correct. Is that right? 4. within few days: a). I will post an update of open/blocked ports In KSA b). Rescan the Network (KSA) to verify open proxies c). Test statProxyParallel and will test for common ports (80,3128 and 8080) using connect proxies (as outlined in Statproxy) to see if it is working. Finally keep up the good work Thank you so much madani _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus |
