Re: [proxyTools-users] escaping a very restrictive

[wayne <wa...@ny...>]

> From: Michael Foord <Mic...@tb...>
> To: "pro...@li..." <pro...@li...>
> Subject: Re: [proxyTools-users] escaping a very restrictive
> 
> wayne wrote:
 
[...]

> This came minutes before I left work but I had time to dig out the old statproxy tests I
> did, download the new version of statproxy (uploaded 16 minutes ago according to
> sourceforge!!)
> 
> Got this result - haven`t had time to properly read the documentation and actually
> *check* if I`m doing the right thing !!

The syntax looks good to me.
 
> Got this result - this make more sense ?? Still looks odd to me.....
> 
> C:\Program Files\localproxy>perl statproxy.pl -t all -a ,192.168.4.1,michael,******
> 192.168.4.1:8080
> 
> statProxy v4.105 report from 192.168.4.67:
> 192.168.4.1     :8080  AFFFFFFFFFFFF FFFFF  0.0/?

This is the right proxy, at least. You got a response this time.
The first test shows 'A'uthentication was required (and it failed).
The rest failed for the same reason.
I hope you tell me that you just entered the wrong password. :-)
Did you have the credentials correct in the environment too 
(shouldn't be needed, but if there's a conflict you might have 
triggered a new bug)?

Again, I don't think I have changed anything that should affect the 
authentication. Do you still have the old statProxy? Does that one 
work?

> Mike

--
wa...@ny...
http://proxytools.sourceforge.net/