proxool-developer

[Proxool-developer] cglib packaging...

[Glen P. <gl...@or...>]

Sorry to be dense, but I didn't understand what this meant in the
release notes for the latest version of proxool:

"Fixed bundling of Cglib in binary release. Cglib is "repackaged"
using JarJar. This release just adds the file proxool-cglib.jar to the
binary release."

Do I need to replace my cglib-2.3.1.jar with proxool-cglib.jar?  Even
if I don't need to, should I?  What did you change in cglib?

Re: [Proxool-developer] cglib packaging...

[Bill H. <bi...@lo...>]

Hi Glen,

The repackaging means that the Cglib is code has been moved into a different
package, one under the proxool namespace. This means that if you use Cglib
outside the Proxool code then you need both proxool-cglib.jar AND
cglib-x.y.z.jar.

The purpose of repackaging is to reduce the dependency on a particular
version of Cglib. If you upgrade to Cgliv 2.whatever then Proxool won't be
effected.

-
Bill

2009/4/10 Glen Peterson <gl...@or...>

> Sorry to be dense, but I didn't understand what this meant in the
> release notes for the latest version of proxool:
>
> "Fixed bundling of Cglib in binary release. Cglib is "repackaged"
> using JarJar. This release just adds the file proxool-cglib.jar to the
> binary release."
>
> Do I need to replace my cglib-2.3.1.jar with proxool-cglib.jar?  Even
> if I don't need to, should I?  What did you change in cglib?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
> Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
> _______________________________________________
> Proxool-developer mailing list
> Pro...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/proxool-developer
>