Hi Vick,
On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 20:39, Vick Timber wrote:
> I was just curious to find if you have further considered putting a method
> like getSQL() in the Connection to retrieve the SQL statement out of a
> connection? That will help a lot in the debugging process and will
> certainly make Proxool far superior than the existing pools.
Ah, that's just the sort of comment that will make it appear in a
version soon :) I did do a little work on this, and then realised that
we'd have to cope with connections having multiple statements, and
statements doing multiple executions (I think). Not very hard but needs
a little thought. Scheduled for 0.9.0.
Bill
|
