Re: [Proxool-developer] Allow empty values in ProxoolDataSource.setDelegateProperties()

[Bill H. <bi...@lo...>]

Hi Tom,

On 12/14/2007 10:59 PM, Tom Duffey wrote:

>  Works great except I had to change line 328 of ProxoolDataSource.java
>  from:
>
>  public void setMaximumActiveTime(int maximumActiveTime) {
>
>  to:
>
>  public void setMaximumActiveTime(long maximumActiveTime) {

Another good catch. I see we use long on the accessor and int on the 
mutator. I've changed it to use long consistently (see CVS).

>  Any idea when the next release will happen, RC or otherwise?

I think we're long overdue for 0.9.0, wouldn't you say? There are still 
a few long-standing open bugs which I'm a bit embarrassed about. I don't 
think there's any reason for another RC release and the next one will be 
0.9.0 final.  So many months go by without anyone mentioning Proxool to 
me that it does seem to get pushed to the bottom of the pile. We still 
get 40 downloads a day which is quite perverse - the majority must be 
automated but I surprised there's that many automated systems interested 
that frequently. The biggest month for downloads (since we started in 
2002) was September this year (1,863). How can that be?

Out of interest, the last version (0.8.3) was exactly four years ago. 
And 0.9.0 has been a release candidate for 21 months. Do we get some 
sort of prize for the the slowest release cycle of a not-dead-yet project?

- Bill