Re: [Proxool-developer] Allow empty values in ProxoolDataSource.setDelegateProperties()
UNMAINTAINED!
Brought to you by:
billhorsman
|
From: Bill H. <bi...@lo...> - 2007-12-14 13:53:39
|
Hi Tom,
Yes, that makes sense. I've just submitted a change to ProxoolDataSource
to do that:
if (stInner.countTokens() == 1) {
// Allow blank string to be a valid value
delegateProperties.put(stInner.nextToken().trim(), "");
} else if (stInner.countTokens() == 2) {
delegateProperties.put(stInner.nextToken().trim(),
stInner.nextToken().trim());
} else {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Unexpected delegateProperties
value: '" + properties + "'. Expected 'name=value'");
}
Would you like to check out a copy of Proxool from CVS and give it a whirl?
Regards,
Bill
On 12/13/2007 03:27 PM, Tom Duffey wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Wondering if we could patch
> ProxoolDataSource.setDelegateProperties(String) to allow specifying
> properties with no value? In other words, I would like to be able
> to do something like:
>
> dataSource.setDelegateProperties("username=foo, password=")
>
> Currently this throws an exception but I think it should be allowed
> and simply ignore the name/value pair when the value is empty.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tom
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net
> Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just
> about anything Open Source.
>
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
> _______________________________________________ Proxool-developer
> mailing list Pro...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/proxool-developer
|