Re: [Proxool-developer] "get connection from pool on create statement" AND "return connection to po
UNMAINTAINED!
Brought to you by:
billhorsman
From: Bill H. <bi...@lo...> - 2004-09-15 14:37:11
|
Hi Mark, > we designed our JSP application 4 years ago such that it uses 1 > connection object per user session. now, we are having a problem > because the JSP application is hitting the maximum connections our > database can support. this would not be a problem if each JSP gets a > connection from the pool and closes it afterwards. we now have more > than 500 JSP pages. I think you're right to want to change from that approach ;) > now, im thinking that it would be nice if the connection is returned > to the pool everytime a statement is closed. and a connection is > retrieved from the pool if a statement is created. do you think this > is a worthwhile addition to proxool ? or is this already supported? > or are there alternatives? That would mean some code changes. And it would be deviating from JDBC standards, wouldn't it? Closing a statement should not close the connection. Can I ask why you want to do that? Why not just write a wrapper in your own application. You ask it for a statement and it goes off and gets a connection for you and creates the statement on your behalf. Then you hand the statement back to the wrapper and it closes the statement and then the conneciton. But if I was looking at some code that said: Statement s = MyWrapper.getStatement(sql); s.execute(); s.close(); I would wonder about what connection it was using. In order for me to understand your problem, please explain what is inappropriate with: Connection c = getConnection(); // Either using a wrapper or JDBC direct Statement s = c.prepareStatement(sql); s.execute(); s.close(); c.close(); (You would do smarter exception handling than that of course). Cheers, Bill |