RE: [Proxool-developer] Stumbling Block for Proxying Concrete Classes

[Bill H. <bi...@lo...>]

Bertrand,

On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 23:18, Bertrand Renuart wrote:

> Don't you think all this is enough (without being too complicated) to make
> most people happy ?

Yep, I do. The point is that proxying the concrete class was going to be
a lot simpler than injectable interfaces :( That was the point in
pursuing it. I will progress injectable interfaces now though: I've
already done the configuration and most of the proxy code. It just
remains for me to do the cached map between interface methods and
concrete methods.

You're summary is correct.

- Bill