RE: [Proxool-developer] Driver specific interfaces

[Bill H. <bi...@lo...>]

On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 21:33, Bertrand Renuart wrote:

> Except, to be easy to use, the StrangeConnectionIF should somehow extend
> java.sql.Connection - otherwise the guy will have to recast all the time -
> but this is up to him to sort it out ;-)

Good point for documentation though.

> BUT, you then have to be carefull when building your proxy because you may
> have several interfaces to implement that extend the same parent
> (java.sql.Connection) - not sure it is a problem...

It isn't.

> And we should also include the following extensions:
> 
>      <resultset-interface>
>        com.outside.jdbc.StrangeResultSetIF
>      </resultset-interface>

Not needed. We don't proxy the ResultSet. At least, not yet.

>      <statement-interface>
>        com.outside.jdbc.StrangeStatementIF
>      </statement-interface>

And PreparedStatement and CallableStatement.

- Bill