Re: [Proxool-developer] Some ideas about future dev

[Bill H. <bi...@lo...>]

Bertrand,

On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 22:35, Bertrand Renuart wrote:

> 1/ Externalize ConnectionTest

Sounds good. Presumably, if any of the registered testers failed then
the connection would be discarded.

> 2/ Externalize Prototyping / Connection creation
[snip]
> I remember someone's post that had problems because he needed to change the
> current thread's user identity before getting a connection 

Yes, I believe that would fix his problem. Not 100% sure though.

> _________________________________
> 3/ Externalize ConnectionResetter

I suppose that would allow people to do things like switch autoCommit
off, and the like.

--

All of these suggestions are good. I would schedule them for after
release 1.0. The criteria for getting into 1.0 are:

1) Increased robustness or bug fixes

2) A "required" feature of a connection pool (like DataSource)

3) Something that will be so useful that it will help make Proxool the
best (like simplified, flexible configuration)

- Bill