From: Bill H. <bi...@lo...> - 2003-12-22 13:50:34
|
Hi Vick, On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 20:39, Vick Timber wrote: > I was just curious to find if you have further considered putting a method > like getSQL() in the Connection to retrieve the SQL statement out of a > connection? That will help a lot in the debugging process and will > certainly make Proxool far superior than the existing pools. Ah, that's just the sort of comment that will make it appear in a version soon :) I did do a little work on this, and then realised that we'd have to cope with connections having multiple statements, and statements doing multiple executions (I think). Not very hard but needs a little thought. Scheduled for 0.9.0. Bill |