Re: [Proxool-developer] CGLIB 2

[Christian N. <chr...@em...>]

Is this really neccecary?

I can hold my DataSource checkins until after the CGLIB 2 related release.

Why dont we just aim for this sequence of releases in HEAD:

0.8.3 - bugfix
0.8.4 - CGLIB 2
0.9   - DataSource (++?)

I'm negative to a branch (and certanly to two) for a couple fof reasons:
1) We will have to make our branch from the v0-8-2 tag. This is confusing. Normal procedure would have been to create a bugfix branch on the v0-8 release.

2) Branching in general leads to confusion. People tend to forget wich branch they work in, forget to merge etc. etc.


We will need a branch if you need to checkin unfinished CGLIB 2 stuff before the 0.8.3 release.

If so I suggest we use the following procedure.

Create a "v0-8-2-PATCH" branch based on the v0-8-2 release:
cvs rtag -b -r v0-8-2 v0-8-2-PATCH proxool

All fixes aimed for v0-8-3 will be checked into this branch, and v0-8-3 will be tagged and released from it.
When we have finished in the branch (probably after 0.8.3) we'll need to merge in to HEAD. This is a two step process:

1) Tag the merge point:
cvs -q rtag -F -r v0-8-2-PATCH v0-8-2-PATCH-MERGED proxool 

2) Merge in from the "v0-8-2-PATCH" branch to HEAD:
cvs update -d -j v0-8-2-PATCH

We don't need a separate branch for the CGLIB stuff if I hold my DataSource checkins right? Alternatively I can keep it in the sandbox.

CHR


----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Horsman <bi...@lo...>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 14:32:32 +0000
To: Proxool Developer List <pro...@li...>
Subject: [Proxool-developer] CGLIB 2

> Hi,
> 
> Chris Nokleberg from the cglib project has kindly written a patch to get
> Proxool working with the new, faster Enhancer and the latest version of
> cglib (we use cglib for proxy support).
> 
> Cglib 2 is binary incompatible with cglib 1 so they have changed the
> package structure slightly. The upshot of which is that the Hibernate
> project (recently part of the JBoss project) wants to use cglib 2 in its
> next release. They don't particularly want to ship both cglib 1 and 2 so
> they have asked us to produce a release for cglib 2.
> 
> I don't know exactly when this will all happen. Sometime in the next few
> weeks cglib 2 will be released. And then sometime after that Hibernate
> will be released. I would like to make a release of Proxool inbetween
> those two events so that Hibernate can ship the latest Proxool.
> 
> I feel we will also be releasing 0.8.3 sometime soon and 0.9.0 (with
> DataSource support) is on the horizon (Christian has taken a look at
> this). I don't want to mess up our release schedule with other events
> beyond our control, so I think we need to do some clever branching.
> 
> I propose a branch for 0.8.3 that is a bug fix branch. We can work on
> the DataSource code in the head branch. And another branch for cglib 2
> (probably based on 0.8.3) Damn, I think we need a picture here.
> 
> Any comments?
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> Proxool-developer mailing list
> Pro...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/proxool-developer

-- 
__________________________________________________________
Sign-up for your own personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

CareerBuilder.com has over 400,000 jobs. Be smarter about your job search
http://corp.mail.com/careers