[Proxool-developer] JMX should be finished

[Christian N. <chr...@em...>]

All jmx tests pass now. The problem was a combination of bugs in both the Proxool JMX bean and in Proxool proper.

I am still not able to null out string properties when testing the JMX bean in JBoss 3.2.1, but the spesific test for this in Proxool passes, so I'm inclined to believe that this is a JBoss bug.

Bill:
The "jmx-agent-id" configration property is not documentet in the RC.
Could you add the following documentation?

-----
jmx-agent-id:
A comma separated list of JMX agent ids (as used by MBeanServerFactory.findMBeanServer(String agentId) ) to register the pool to. This property is only used if the "jmx" property is set to "true". All registered JMX servers will be used if this property is not set.   
-----

There is also a bug in the documentation for the "jmx" property:

object name: "Proxool:type=Pool, name=". 

...should be changed to:

object name: "Proxool:type=Pool, name=<alias>".

CHR 
-- 
__________________________________________________________
Sign-up for your own personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

CareerBuilder.com has over 400,000 jobs. Be smarter about your job search
http://corp.mail.com/careers