Re: [Proxool-developer] jmx properties are being sendt to the driver?

[Bill H. <bi...@lo...>]

Hi CHR,

On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 00:08, Christian Nedregaard wrote:

> I hope to get this done tomorrow. If I can't make my test work I'll
> remove some unessential JMX functionality from this release. So the
> JMX stuff should be ready really soon one way or another.

Great. I can see 0.8.0 on the horizon now.

> It seems like the jmx properties are being interpreted as driver properties:
> 
> 60 [testMultipleAgents] DEBUG org.logicalcobwebs.proxool.testMultipleAgents  - Delegating property to driver: proxool.jmx-agent-id=testAgent1, testAgent2
> 60 [testMultipleAgents] DEBUG org.logicalcobwebs.proxool.testMultipleAgents  - Delegating property to driver: proxool.jmx=true

A proxool prefix doesn't guarantee it doesn't get passed on to the
delegate driver. The proxool prefix just helps us to have unique
property names. What's important is whether the ConnectionPoolDefinition
class recognises it. "proxool.jmx" is recognised. "proxool.jmx-agent-id"
is not. Should that property be passed to somewhere? If so, it would
mean a change to ConnectionPoolDefinition to treat it as a special case
(which is fine).

Bill