Re: [Proxool-developer] Getting ready for 1.0

[Martin C. <mus...@us...>]

 >
 > Yeah, we'll take a deep breath and support DataSource sometime. 1.1+ I
 > think.

Yeah.. no rush, but certainly a must at somepoint.... And don't ask me 
to do it;)

 >
 > I don't suppose they'll want to add Proxool support
 > until we are at 1.0. And that won't be for another month (I'm guessing).
 >

Timing would proabably be okay. Perhaps even for 1.1 if it was a soon 
release. There is no real indication of when Hibernate 2.0 is going to 
be release. But probably getting in before the next beta would be good.

 >
 >>>My opinion is that we shouldn't try and squeeze much more into 1.0 and
 >>>we should plant our feet firmly in the ground and say "it's ready!".
 >>>

Yup. I agree too.

 > Yeah, I asked for it! I think I'll add a RoadMap to the web site for all
 > this stuff. But I suppose I should wait for your doc freeze to be
 > complete first. Actually, I am just making a link fix now. Perhaps I
 > should just tell you what it is:
 >
 > listen.html has links to:
 > api/org/logicalcobwebs/proxool/StatisticsListenerIF.html, and
 > api/org/logicalcobwebs/proxool/StatisticsIF.html
 >
 > they should have the admin package in the path:
 > api/org/logicalcobwebs/proxool/admin/StatisticsListenerIF.html, and
 > api/org/logicalcobwebs/proxool/admin/StatisticsIF.html
 >

No prob. I haven't started yet:)

 >
 > Yeah, it would be great to be associated with Hibernate. Do you want to
 > talk to them, or shall I?

I've already popped my little nose around the project contributing a doc 
on Hibernate and XDoclet, and made an important feature request (yes, I 
only ask for the world on a platter;), I'd imagine it would be easy to 
get them on board for the Proxool support.

Now I've never used c3po or DBCP, but can someone point out what our 
differences incase they ask.

Martin