Re: [Proxool-developer] Bug 673073 (was no subject)

[Bill H. <bi...@lo...>]

Hi Andrew,

On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 16:10, Andrew Budarevsky wrote:

> In case of the servlet engine I would sugest a Proxool Control Panel
> having a form of servlet and swing application or a java bean with UI
> customizer. 

Are we getting into jmx territory here?

  http://java.sun.com/products/JavaManagement/

We might end up righting a JMX component sometime.

> What I meant exactly is how Proxool react to framework state changes.

What sort of state changes are you thinking of? I can think of 1)
Configuration, 2) Shutdown.

We now have that behaviour with ServletConfigurator and
AvalonConfigurator. The API already allows you to do all these things,
no?

-- 
  Bill Horsman
  Proxool
  http://proxool.sourceforge.net
  ICQ: 119577180