Re: [Proxool-developer] configuration via properties file

[Bruce S. <fe...@fr...>]

This one time, at band camp, Bas Cancrinus said:

BC>Bill Horsman wrote:
BC>> Does anyone have any thoughts of whether we should include the
BC>> XMLConfigurator in the binary distribution? Doing so would mean a
BC>> dependence for everyone on JAXP and a compliant parser. I must admit,
BC>> I'm tempted to do it...
BC>
BC>I'd like to propose the distribution of 2 jars: one that contains the 
BC>basic proxool driver and another that contains your convenience classes. 
BC>That'll make things conveniently arranged.
BC>
BC>Kind regards,
BC>Bas

How about just an Ant task to do this for you. That way if you don't
want two jars in your environment, there's no hard requirement for it.

Bruce
-- 
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","<0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F9E<G)E=\$\!F<FEI+F-O;0\`\`");'