Re: [Proxool-developer] configuration via properties file

[Bas C. <ba...@ci...>]

Bill Horsman wrote:
> Does anyone have any thoughts of whether we should include the
> XMLConfigurator in the binary distribution? Doing so would mean a
> dependence for everyone on JAXP and a compliant parser. I must admit,
> I'm tempted to do it...

I'd like to propose the distribution of 2 jars: one that contains the 
basic proxool driver and another that contains your convenience classes. 
That'll make things conveniently arranged.

Kind regards,
Bas

-- 
Bas Cancrinus   -> ba...@ci...
Software Architect
Cipherware Ltd. -> http://www.cipherware.com