Hi,
Chris Mungall wrote:
>The code seems very stable, and I've used it extensively
>
>I have a few changes I would like to commit to support codelistings (a
>new @cl tag) - shall we discuss these on the prologdoc-devel list?
>
>You can see an example here:
>http://www.fruitfly.org/~cjm/blip/pdoc/graphviz.html
>
>And more here:
>http://www.fruitfly.org/~cjm/blip/modules.html
>
>
Seems useful to me. What are the technical consequences, Salvador (I
need to delve into the source code again ...)?
>There are a few changes I'd like to see, but don't really know the code
>well enough to implement - in particular, I would like to preserve the
>ordering of predicates I have in my source (pdoc currently sorts these
>alphabetically) - my docs often have some linear flow
>
>
Would it be interesting to assign priorities to comments too? All
comments with same priority level could be listed alphabetically (maybe
with their own heading). By using a switch tag in the file comment, the
relevant ordering (completely alphabetically, ordering from file or
priority ordering) could be chosen.
Could this behavior be implemented solely in XSLT?
>I think before we have a release we need at minimum a home page that isn't
>misleading. There's a chance I may be able to work on this in the next
>month
>
>
OK, it needed a revamp badly ;-)!
>
>
>>So Salvador, can you brief us about PrologDocNGs current form and any
>>necessary, but lacking features? Chris (everybody in fact), what's your
>>vision about PrologDoc's future? Any other remarks (role assignment,
>>collaboration model, ... )?
>>
>>
>
>I'm happy to help out coding and with documentation in so far as time
>allows. I'm happier working around the edges on things such as the xslts
>since I'm not familiar enough with the guts of the code to do much else
>(ironically the pdoc internals could really do with a bit more
>documentation!)
>
>
Good suggestion. Salvador, if time allows, I'll try to explore the
source code. Could you provide us a high-level overview of the current
architecture?
>Does someone want to respond to the question on the swi list?
>
>
I think Salvador is subscribed to that mailing list. But, apparently
someone else has already responded.
Kind regards,
Bram Adams
|
