From: Jaroslav S. <jsk...@re...> - 2016-12-02 15:16:08
|
Thanks for info, I wanted to hear your opinion, I will treat it the same way downstream (Fedora) thanks & regards Jaroslav ----- Original Message ----- > nf_conntrack_pptp is not needed by pptp. > > nf_conntrack_pptp is for systems that route pptp. > > nf_conntrack_pptp has a side-effect of ICMP unreachable suppression. > > Some people try nf_conntrack_pptp to fix interoperability problems > between systems; yet they are not routing pptp. It hides the problem, > and doesn't fix it. It works by side-effect. > > Once a problem is identified, we can design a better solution. > > I've not seen a good description of the problem, but if it has to do > with zero call id, we have a new patch in 1.9.0 which may also fix the > problem. > > Can you please work with people who use nf_conntrack_pptp to find out > what the problem is, instead of accepting a side-effect solution? > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:44:54PM -0500, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > Hi, > > > > as the net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_helper now defaults to 0, users > > now usually have to manually load the nf_conntrack_pptp module. > > What do you think about auto-loading it (if available through e.g. > > libkmod or just via modprobe)? > > > > thanks & regards > > > > Jaroslav > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > > pptpclient-devel mailing list > > ppt...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pptpclient-devel > > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.netrek.org/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > pptpclient-devel mailing list > ppt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pptpclient-devel > |