From: Greg B. <gre...@zn...> - 2003-07-06 06:17:21
|
Hi Gang, I'm trying to build Powertweak 0.99.4... I get the following error during make. Not sure what output from configure I should attach, so please let me know what details I should follow up with. System is RH9, Athlon... mv -f .libs/plugin.lo plugin.lo /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src/include -Wall -W -O2 -g -Wall -W -fno-common -pedantic -I/usr/include/libxml2 -DPLUGINDIR=\"/usr/local/lib/powertweak/plugins/\" -DCOREPLUGINDIR=\"/usr/local/lib/powertweak/plugins/core/\" -DPROFILEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/powertweak/profile/auto/\" -c profile.c rm -f .libs/profile.lo gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src/include -Wall -W -O2 -g -Wall -W -fno-common -pedantic -I/usr/include/libxml2 -DPLUGINDIR=\"/usr/local/lib/powertweak/plugins/\" -DCOREPLUGINDIR=\"/usr/local/lib/powertweak/plugins/core/\" -DPROFILEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/powertweak/profile/auto/\" -c profile.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/profile.lo profile.c:14:45: parser.h: No such file or directory profile.c:126: parse error before "doc" profile.c: In function `merge_profile': profile.c:130: `xmlDocPtr' undeclared (first use in this function) profile.c:130: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once profile.c:130: for each function it appears in.) profile.c:130: parse error before "doc" profile.c:131: `xmlNodePtr' undeclared (first use in this function) profile.c:136: `doc' undeclared (first use in this function) profile.c:136: warning: implicit declaration of function `xmlParseFile' profile.c:143: `cur' undeclared (first use in this function) profile.c:143: warning: implicit declaration of function `xmlDocGetRootElement' profile.c:146: warning: implicit declaration of function `xmlFreeDoc' profile.c: At top level: profile.c:181: parse error before "doc" profile.c: In function `do_one_xml_record': profile.c:187: `cur' undeclared (first use in this function) profile.c:193: warning: implicit declaration of function `xmlNodeListGetString' profile.c:193: `doc' undeclared (first use in this function) make[2]: *** [profile.lo] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/local_builds/powertweak/src/libpowertweak' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/local_builds/powertweak/src' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 -- Greg Bell 858-755-1915 (try gbe...@ya... if mail to me bounces) |
From: Sven D. <sv...@oz...> - 2003-07-06 06:36:29
|
hey there :) this is a simple one (ish.) libxml2 moved the include files from /usr/include/libxml2 to /usr/include/libxml2/libxml.=20 at the moment (as i am trying to figure out the best way to get rid of the memory alloc/ de-alloc issues in the DMI plugin) all i do is copy the contents of the libxml dir down one. totally naive solution, but it get the build on its way. i will fix it for 0.99.5, but work is so busy at the moment, i'm spending much of my free time sleeping and watching movies. sven On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 16:17, Greg Bell wrote: > Hi Gang, >=20 > I'm trying to build Powertweak 0.99.4... I get the following error during= =20 > make. Not sure what output from configure I should attach, so please let= =20 > me know what details I should follow up with. >=20 > System is RH9, Athlon... >=20 > mv -f .libs/plugin.lo plugin.lo > /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=3Dcompile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.=20 > -I../../src/include -Wall -W -O2 -g -Wall -W -fno-common -pedantic=20 > -I/usr/include/libxml2 -DPLUGINDIR=3D\"/usr/local/lib/powertweak/plugins/= \"=20 > -DCOREPLUGINDIR=3D\"/usr/local/lib/powertweak/plugins/core/\"=20 > -DPROFILEDIR=3D\"/usr/local/share/powertweak/profile/auto/\" -c profile.c > rm -f .libs/profile.lo > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src/include -Wall -W -O2 -g -Wall -W=20 > -fno-common -pedantic -I/usr/include/libxml2=20 > -DPLUGINDIR=3D\"/usr/local/lib/powertweak/plugins/\"=20 > -DCOREPLUGINDIR=3D\"/usr/local/lib/powertweak/plugins/core/\"=20 > -DPROFILEDIR=3D\"/usr/local/share/powertweak/profile/auto/\" -c profile.c= =20 > -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/profile.lo > profile.c:14:45: parser.h: No such file or directory > profile.c:126: parse error before "doc" > profile.c: In function `merge_profile': > profile.c:130: `xmlDocPtr' undeclared (first use in this function) > profile.c:130: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > profile.c:130: for each function it appears in.) > profile.c:130: parse error before "doc" > profile.c:131: `xmlNodePtr' undeclared (first use in this function) > profile.c:136: `doc' undeclared (first use in this function) > profile.c:136: warning: implicit declaration of function `xmlParseFile' > profile.c:143: `cur' undeclared (first use in this function) > profile.c:143: warning: implicit declaration of function=20 > `xmlDocGetRootElement' > profile.c:146: warning: implicit declaration of function `xmlFreeDoc' > profile.c: At top level: > profile.c:181: parse error before "doc" > profile.c: In function `do_one_xml_record': > profile.c:187: `cur' undeclared (first use in this function) > profile.c:193: warning: implicit declaration of function=20 > `xmlNodeListGetString' > profile.c:193: `doc' undeclared (first use in this function) > make[2]: *** [profile.lo] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/local_builds/powertweak/src/libpowertweak' > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/local_builds/powertweak/src' > make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 --=20 Sven Dowideit <sv...@oz...> |
From: Greg B. <gre...@zn...> - 2003-07-06 07:06:45
|
> i will fix it for 0.99.5, but work is so busy at the moment Sounds good. I ended up using the .rpm which let me see that my Via bridge chip isn't supported (nice embedded nasty-gram for via in PowerTweak!) There was a patch for 2.4.10 that allowed the via bridge chip to properly disconnect from the CPU and allow the CPU to go to sleep. Shaved tons of heat/power waste off my system, since it was actually able to idle properly after that. Supposedly one of the patches was a PCI quirk/tweak... in my notes I have to check PowerTweak when I upgraded to RH9 (which I have done). So, bottom line, I'm trying to get my Athlon T-bird to idle properly with RH9... Any suggestions? Thanks much for the help and quick previous response. ~gb -- Greg Bell 858-755-1915 (try gbe...@ya... if mail to me bounces) |
From: Sven D. <sv...@oz...> - 2003-07-06 22:57:20
|
On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 17:06, Greg Bell wrote: > > i will fix it for 0.99.5, but work is so busy at the moment >=20 > Sounds good. I ended up using the .rpm which let me see that my Via=20 > bridge chip isn't supported (nice embedded nasty-gram for via in=20 > PowerTweak!) >=20 Dave - is this still the case, or have they been helping you out more recently? > There was a patch for 2.4.10 that allowed the via bridge chip to properly= =20 > disconnect from the CPU and allow the CPU to go to sleep. Shaved tons of= =20 > heat/power waste off my system, since it was actually able to idle=20 > properly after that. >=20 > Supposedly one of the patches was a PCI quirk/tweak... in my notes I have= =20 > to check PowerTweak when I upgraded to RH9 (which I have done). >=20 > So, bottom line, I'm trying to get my Athlon T-bird to idle properly with= =20 > RH9...=20 >=20 this is the bit of powertweak that i am not very knowlegdeable about :(=20 hopefully Dave or Arjan might know.... return question :) have you run redhat-proc-conf ? i'm curious to know what they changed - if there is anything useful i should integrate the changes too (they stoles it way back when :) > Any suggestions? >=20 > Thanks much for the help and quick previous response. ooo the sweet irony :) >=20 > ~gb |
From: Greg B. <gre...@zn...> - 2003-07-07 01:27:45
|
> return question :) have you run redhat-proc-conf ? i'm curious to know > what they changed - if there is anything useful i should integrate the > changes too (they stoles it way back when :) running it... the only thing under "Hardware" is RaID, with throughput limits. lots of other categories. want screenshots? -- Greg Bell 858-755-1915 (try gbe...@ya... if mail to me bounces) |
From: Sven D. <sv...@oz...> - 2003-07-07 08:49:24
|
nah,=20 if its only a small difference then there's not much rush :) thanks :) obviously you want the via bridge tweaking support, but do you have any more feature requests?=20 my personal goals for powertweak are more in the monitoring (with graphing?) and network management direction (though i do want to be able to tweak 2.6 to let my notebook & mp3 machine run quiet and low power) sven On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 11:27, Greg Bell wrote: > > return question :) have you run redhat-proc-conf ? i'm curious to know > > what they changed - if there is anything useful i should integrate the > > changes too (they stoles it way back when :) >=20 > running it... the only thing under "Hardware" is RaID, with throughput > limits. lots of other categories. want screenshots? >=20 |