From: Kamalesh B. <kam...@li...> - 2015-05-15 06:38:13
|
On 05/15/2015 11:01 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: >> >Both retrans_time and retrans_time_ms behave synonymously. i.e., if you >> >modify one file the value gets reflected in another. >> >We can avoid the warning from snap, by copying the non deprecated version >> >and still we could have the required debugging >> >information. > Ah, nice. > Assuming we're only skipping these files under /proc/sys and/or chances > of similarly named files in paths we care about is none: > Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao<nav...@li...> Thanks for the review. AFAIK, both retrans_time and base_reachable_time are network tunable, living under /proc. We might not end up accidentally losing any other diagnostic data, while safely ignoring both of the deprecated files. Thanks, Kamalesh. |